Beware the insurgency
Governor may find he can't always pick his battles
By Timm Herdt
Ventura County Star
March 2, 2005
At
precisely the same time Tuesday that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
was sending out his signature-gathering infantry for the ballot-box
war he seeks to wage in the fall, an Assembly committee was
moving along what could become a weapon of choice for the insurgency
against him.
On a party-line vote, Democrats on the
Assembly Judiciary Committee approved a new version of a
consumer-protection bill that Schwarzenegger vetoed last
year -- a measure backers call "The
Car Buyers' Bill of Rights."
Among other things, the bill would establish
a three-day "cooling
off" period in which a buyer could return a car, set standards
for what would qualify as a "certified" used car
and regulate what supporters say are abuses in auto financing.
As you might imagine, if you've ever bought a car, the bill
enjoys immense -- if probably reflexive -- public support.
Assemblywoman Cindy Montanez, D-San Fernando, the bill's author,
said polling done last year showed 80 percent support. The
demographic group least likely to back the idea, she said,
was Republican men -- and 70 percent of them thought it was
a good idea.
Last year's bill was passionately opposed by the state's auto
dealers, including those whose financial contributions had
helped pump up Schwarzenegger during the recall election because
of his promise to roll back the vehicle license fee.
In the end, Schwarzenegger sided with
the car dealers and vetoed the bill. But he parsed his veto
message carefully, insisting "protection of California
consumers is of paramount concern."
He suggested that if lawmakers clarified some of the terms
and tightened up the language he would reconsider this year.
He may not have the chance. Some Democrats believe this is
something they could take directly to voters -- and reap a
tactical political advantage in the process.
Schwarzenegger is backing four measures that to ordinary voters
are arcane at best. Restructuring public employee pensions,
redrawing political boundary lines, recalculating the way schoolteachers
are paid and enacting a complex formula to limit state spending
are not exactly things discussed at most family get-togethers.
Californians do talk about their cars, however, and about
their experiences buying them.
Not many people stay up at night worrying about state spending
formulas. Folks do, however, lose sleep worrying about how
to make the next car payment or how to replace the family car
that's worth less than what they owe on it.
Schwarzenegger said Tuesday the ballot-box
war he will wage "is
not my fight .... This is the people's fight."
If that's the case, Democratic insurgents would like to argue,
where was the governor last year when he had the chance to
fight for consumers' rights?
Some Democrats have also floated the idea of putting an increase
in the minimum wage before voters in the fall.
That, too, is an idea that polls well with the public but
is vigorously opposed by business interests -- and when given
the chance to choose last year, Schwarzenegger vetoed an increase
in the minimum wage.
Some Democrats would like to ask at election
time, for whom was the self-proclaimed "people's governor" fighting
when he vetoed that?
Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez fumed on
Tuesday: "It's
hypocritical to say you want to implement the people's agenda,
but you're doing it with money from corporate interests."
To be sure, there are disagreements among
Democrats over how best to fight Schwarzenegger's proposed "reforms." Finding
the right strategy is complicated by the financial calculus
because Schwarzenegger has vowed to raise $50 million for the
campaign.
Indeed, he is scheduled to head to the East Coast later this
week on a fund-raising tour to collect out-of-state money to
help wage his California fight.
Democrats know that public employee unions -- both here and
nationally -- will spend generously to attempt to defeat any
plan to take away pensions.
There may be precious little money left over to try to wage
an offensive battle as well as a defensive one.
Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, D-Oakland, counseled
Tuesday against putting other measures on the ballot.
"We're not going to war on the initiatives," he
said. "We don't have the resources to do that. My own
view is that you take four really bad ideas and you defeat
them on their merits."
Either way, that Car Buyers' Bill of Rights is again moving
through the Legislature. If there is an election in November,
Democrats at the very least will dare Schwarzenegger to again
veto that proposal in September.
|